Business process change
Business process change is often a major element of developing and/or implementing a new strategy.
Every organisation wants to improve the way it does business in order to produce things more efficiently and/or to make greater profits. A change to a business process might lead to a competitive advantage or remove existing competitive disadvantages by either reducing costs or differentiating the business.
For example, if a bank can reduce its mortgage approval period from 10 days to 1 day, then this could allow the mortgage activity to stand out from rivals. In order to achieve this change the bank will have to redesign the approval process (for example, by changing job roles, using more efficient IT systems etc.).
What is a business process?
At its most generic, a business process is any set of activities performed by a business that is initiated by an event, transforms information, materials or business commitments, and produces an output.
- Value chains and large-scale business processes produce outputs that are valued by external customers.
- Other processes generate outputs that are valued by 'internal' customers and other users.
- have customers, internal and external
- are independent of formal organisational structure
- may cross organisational boundaries
- should be linked to strategic objectives
- exist in a hierarchy.
Organisations rely on a range of core and support processes to create value for their customers.
- Every business has unique characteristics embedded in its core processes that help it achieve its goals and create competitive advantage.
- Strategic business processes, such as new product design or high-sensitivity customer care, provide unique and durable business advantages to organisations.
- Those processes that depend on people's intelligence, experience, knowledge, judgement and creativity are the hardest for rivals to duplicate
Process change has been a driver of strategic developments for a very long time. Initiatives have included the following:
1903 - Henry Ford
- developed a new manufacturing process for cars and so revolutionised the industry.
1911 - Frederick Taylor published his work on 'scientific management'
- Stressed how processes could be analysed scientifically to determine the best way of performing them and the optimal type of employee for the job.
- He was the forerunner of operational research, work analysis and time-and-motion studies.
1980s - Systems theory
- Systems theory encouraged managers to see how each part of the organisation is connected to other parts, to look at inputs and outputs and to consider linkages within the bigger picture.
1985 - Porter's value chain
Porter's value chain is discussed in detail here. Key ideas relevant to this discussion are as follows.
- All activities are seen as being capable of adding value.
- All activities involved with production and all support activities are shown on a single value chain. This ensures that 'big picture' issues such as consistency are considered.
- Activities are emphasised rather than departments. This results in a greater focus on activity based costing and budgeting techniques, for example.
- Linkages between activities are stressed.
1990 - Business Process Reengineering (BPR)
BPR is 'fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business process to achieve dramatic improvements in contemporary measures such as cost, quality and speed'.
- Managers must consider the bigger picture and how processes affect each other (e.g. a more complex system of management reporting might slow down production).
- Individual processes should be viewed as being integrated into a dozen or so major processes (e.g. a single process might start with the initial order, go through production and product delivery and finish with after-sales customer service).
- IT should be seen as a major tool to improve/streamline/integrate processes.
- Greater customer-focus.
A major problem was the difficulty in integrating IT systems with corporate processes resulting in some major failures to implement schemes. Add to this employee distrust that BPR simply meant staff cuts it was no surprise that the term fell into disuse during the late 1990s.
Mid 1990s - Software-based initiatives
- Workflow systems software was originally concerned with automating and controlling the flow of electronic documents.
- Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems developed this idea into representing a wide range of activities as linked modules on diagrams. To some degree, by changing the diagrams managers could control information flow and employee behaviour. These were used with most success in managing accounting, inventory and human resource processes.
- Both workflow systems and ERP approaches had a heavy emphasis on using IT to improve existing processes rather than making radical changes.
- The capability maturity model (CMM) was developed to show the different levels at which organisations use IT to develop processes. Level 5 is the ultimate aim where processes are continuously improved in a systematic way.
Mid 1990s - The Rummler-Brache Methodology
Rummler and Brache produced a framework that showed how different aspects of process development related to each other.
- They defined three levels of performance (organisational, process and job or performer level) and three perspectives (goals and measures, design and implementation, management).
- The CMM model showed how organisations evolve towards maturity and the Rummler-Brache framework showed nine areas that need to be mastered/considered.
Quality based approaches
Quality initiatives and process development overlap in many aspects, including the following.
- ISO9000 - the 2000 version stresses the role of quality processes rather than simply the production of documentation to win accreditation.
- Six sigma approaches stress how the success of processes can be measured by focusing on customer satisfaction.
The link between business process change and strategy
If we consider a top-down approach to strategic planning, then the goals and measures are laid out by the senior managers as the organisation's strategy.
- Each department or group is assigned only a portion of the corporate goals.
- As the goals are delegated they become narrower and the measures associated with them become more specific.
From the value chain a process is divided into sub processes and sub-sub processes and eventually into specific activities.
- Ideally, one or more measures for each activity are established.
- The measurements determine if the process is working.
When we analyse a process or redesign a process we ask:
- what the activity is contributing to the overall sub process or value chain to which it belongs?
- how can we determine whether the activity is actually achieving its purpose?
Looking at the business in terms of activities and processes opens up scope for challenging the ways in which things are done, and coming up with improvements, or sometimes more radical changes. The approach is often termed business process improvement or re-engineering, the latter referring to more radical rethinking. The term 'Business process redesign' is sometimes used as well. The range of opportunities includes the following:
- if a process is relatively stable and the goal is to make incremental improvements, then the term 'process improvement' is used.
- at the other extreme if a major (core) process needs radical redesigning, then the term 'process re-engineering' is used.
- the term 'process redesign' is used for any processes that fall between these two extremes.
Processes should contribute to the overall strategy of an organisation and the individual process goals should align with the strategic goals. For example, if the overall goal of the organisation is to become a quality leader in its respective market, process goals such as 'shortest execution time' may lead to counter-productive behaviour by process participants who receive incentives for finishing work fast - even if it does not meet the highest quality standards.
Alternatively, the investigation and potential re-design of the way processes take place within an organisation supports the lenses that Johnson, Scholes and Whittington termed, respectively, experience and ideas. An investigation of current processes might suggest that process goals and measures may not be aligned with strategy. This may be because the processes have diverged from their original specification or it maybe because the strategy is not operationally feasible and the people undertaking the processes to implement it know this. Consequently, processes are often modified by employees and managers to make them workable and eventually, strategy is modified to accept this.
The re-design of processes may lead to incremental changes or it may lead to a significant strategic shift. Opportunities discovered while focusing on specific processes may have very significant repercussions for strategy.
Harmon's process-strategy matrix
According to Paul Harmon a process-strategy matrix is a matrix formed by an estimate of:
- the strategic importance of a process on the horizontal axis
- the process complexity and dynamics on the vertical axis.
This matrix can be used to determined how to manage individual processes.
Assuming that 'low' is positioned at the bottom left corner:
- processes that fall in the lower-left are of little complexity, do not change very often and do not have much strategic importance. They should be automated if possible and given the minimum resources necessary for efficient functioning
- processes that lie at the upper-right are complex, dynamic and of high strategic importance. These are usually the processes that provide the organisation with its competitive advantage and should be nurtured accordingly.
The commoditisation of business processes and outsourcing
While there is an ongoing trend towards outsourcing in many areas, most organisations view processes as an in-house activity.
This has been for a number of reasons.
- There is a perceived lack of comparability between the firm's processes and the competences of outside suppliers.
- A lack of standardisation of processes making it difficult to assess whether the process will be improved by outsourcing.
- The high perceived costs of outsourcing compared to the difficult to assess benefits.
However, there is a trend towards increasing business process outsourcing (BPO)
Advantages and disadvantages of BPO
Claimed advantages of BPO include:
- Cost savings (currently the main decision-making factor).
- Improved customer care.
- Allows management to focus on core activities.
Problems seen to date include:
- problems finding a single supplier for complex processes, resulting in fragmentation
- firms are unwilling to outsource whole processes due to the strategic significance or security implications of certain elements
- inflexible contracts and other problems managing suppliers
- problems measuring performance
- data security.
One solution is that some firms have set up shared off-shore captive service centres (off-shore in-house rather than off-shore outsourced).
In deciding whether to outsource, the following key questions need to be addressed:
(1)What is the desired benefit of outsourcing?
- Cost savings
- To focus on the core business
- To match industry best practice
- To improve service levels.
(2)Which processes should be outsourced?
- Repetitive, transaction-intensive processes are usually the best choices.
(3)How well is the process currently performed?
- Outsourcing a process that currently exceeds competitor benchmarks would be unwise.
Note: the "usual" pros/cons of outsourcing discussed under corporate strategy - cost, quality, control, risk - still apply here.
Improving the processes of an organisation
Process redesign, often called Business Process Re-engineering (BPR), Business Process Management (BPM) or Business Process Improvement (BPI) takes a 'clean sheet' approach to the process, which is usually either broken, or so slow that it is no longer competitive in delivering the company's value to its customer.
Business process redesign methodology
Harmon recommends a five-stage generic business process redesign methodology:
Major redesign projects are usually managed by a steering committee and undertaken by a team that represents all the functional managers involved in the change.
Evaluating the effectiveness of an existing process
Diagrams are particularly useful to see who is responsible for what and it is also easy to start identifying potential inefficiencies and potential areas of improvement.
- Are there any gaps or steps missing?
- Is there duplication?
- Are there overlaps, where several people or teams perform the same task or activity?
- Are there activities that add no value?
Process redesign solutions
Once the potential areas for improvement have been identified, the next step is to decide how to address the issues and make changes.
- Diagrams can also be used at this stage to map out the proposed process changes.
- As with any proposed changes in the organisation, the pros and cons need to be analysed, and any changes that follow must be carefully planned.
Range of process redesign patterns
A process redesign pattern is an approach or solution that has often worked in the past. There are several patterns that have proved popular in redesign efforts. For example:
- Re-engineering - start with a clean sheet of paper and question all assumptions.
- Value-added analysis - try to eliminate all non-value-adding activities. Porter's value chain model covered in chapter 3 may be particularly useful here.
- Simplification - try to simplify the flow of the process, eliminating duplication and redundancy.
- Gaps and disconnects - a process redesign pattern that focuses on checking the hand offs between departments and functional groups in order to assure that flows across departmental lines are smooth and effective.
These options can be summarised in the following diagram.
- Towards the left side, the kinds of problems companies face are outlined.
- In the middle, we show a continuum that ranges from Process Improvement to Clean Sheet Design.
- On the right, the ten popular patterns and interventions are shown, roughly aligned to the types of problems they are most commonly used to solve.
Establishing redesign options
An analysis of the range of problems companies face is important since it reminds us that different types of problems call for different types of interventions.
- The first key distinction is the distinction between changing existing processes and creating completely new processes.
- A second distinction is the distinction between doing a major redesign of an existing process and simply improving an existing process.
We can improve a process in a number of ways. We can look at it in terms of:
- the process and ask whether we need some steps at all - or whether we can skip them or shortcut them
- where value is added and where the activities involved are wasteful, e.g. any activity that involves storage or waiting in a queue is essentially adding no value and is a target for elimination
- where we might be able to combine or integrate activities, e.g. replacing a machine and a handling operation with one that does both
- starting with a blank sheet of paper and redesigning a way of converting inputs into outputs. This might be relatively simple, e.g. in the paper processing in banking or insurance there may be considerable scope for redesigning and simplifying the route that things take, making sure it is more direct and does not have unnecessary repetition.
This analysis usually results in a number of possible redesign alternatives. In a similar manner to strategy evaluation covered here (suitability, feasibility, acceptability), these redesign options need to be evaluated. Options are likely to have varying degrees of feasibility due to such factors as money, culture, effect of change,etc.
When new processes are implemented a good management system is the key to ensuring that the new process is actually implemented effectively. The management of process activities is concerned with:
- setting goals
- assigning tasks
- monitoring results
- improving processes
- taking corrective action as needed.
Generic software solutions and business process redesign
Firms seek to redesign processes to increase their competitive edge. By using generic software packages they may be able to match the best practice of competitors who also use the software, but are less likely to outperform them.
Note: that there is a tension in the academic texts between those who believe that software packages define best practise (e.g. Davenport) and others (e.g. Harmon) who feel they represent average practise.
As opposed to the BPR approach explained above, the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) - driven approach to software solutions occur in reverse order. In effect, businesses start with the solution and then modify processes.
SAP, the main ERP vendor, provides comprehensive business maps (or 'process architectures') for different industries offering a wide range of modules covering the processes involved in that industry. For example, the insurance business map includes modules for claims notification, claims handling, claims accounting, etc.
Clients can choose the modules they require and then specify how they wish to link them together and how they wish to control them. The ERP vendor will provide the underlying workflow engine that passes control from one process to the next.
It is still possible to follow traditional redesign efforts (for example, by applying Harmon's 5 step process), but, generally, companies tend to accommodate the way that they work around the application rather than the other way around.
It can be argued therefore that this approach may be more appropriate to processes that are not complex. When processes are complex, a fundamental redesign process should be used.
Created at 10/10/2012 11:13 AM by System Account
(GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London
Last modified at 9/11/2013 12:19 PM by System Account
(GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London
Ratings & Comments
(Click the stars to rate the page)